List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Confirm requirements of modified formula | 1.1 | Check that specifications for new compound are complete and unambiguous |
| 1.2 | Clarify items which are unclear or beyond the normal scope of work |
| 1.3 | Investigate the type of changes/materials which are likely to meet these requirements |
| 1.4 | Clarify any possible issues if different, unusual or exotic materials are likely to be required |
| 1.5 | Identify tests required on trial compound |
|
2 | Estimate starting formula | 2.1 | Identify existing compound(s) with similar specifications |
| 2.2 | Estimate required changes to existing compound |
| 2.3 | Check practicality of proposed changes |
| 2.4 | Check health, safety and environment (HSE) impacts of proposed changes |
| 2.5 | Modify proposed starting formulae as appropriate |
|
3 | Prepare trial compounds | 3.1 | Identify and control all hazards for pilot mixing |
| 3.2 | Identify and check all required plant and equipment |
| 3.3 | Obtain and prepare all required materials |
| 3.4 | Mix trial compound and obtain sample(s) |
| 3.5 | Interpret test results |
| 3.6 | Modify formula and repeat trials as required |
|
4 | Check initial factory trial | 4.1 | Check availability of required resources and plant availability |
| 4.2 | Ensure all authorities and permissions have been obtained |
| 4.3 | Check all hazard controls have been implemented |
| 4.4 | Monitor factory trial mixing of compound |
| 4.5 | Obtain sample(s) and interpret test results |
| 4.6 | Modify formula and repeat factory trial as required |
|
5 | Complete trial | 5.1 | Complete all required records and reports |
| 5.2 | Check any changes to resources and procedures have been incorporated into standard procedures |
| 5.3 | Ensure any additional HSE or skill requirements have been included in future plans |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:
read and interpret procedures, job specifications, instruments/control panels, material labels and safety data sheets (SDS)
identify specifications for amended formula
apply a theoretical understanding of polymers to estimate changes that will meet production and safety requirements
undertake tests and laboratory/pilot trials
monitor factory trial
modify the formula based on test data
make final adjustments for the scaled up formula to work successfully in the factory
communicate effectively with team/work group and supervisors
complete workplace records and reports
do basic arithmetical manipulations, including additions, subtractions, divisions, fractions and percentages.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to operate independently and to solve routine and non-routine problems, including knowledge of:
existing compounds, their properties and components
characteristics of compound components and their impact on compound properties
expected impact of variations in compound components on compound properties
mixing methods and the impacts of different mixing on compound properties
requirements for factory trialling and scaling up from laboratory/pilot scale
tests which might be used and the applicability of the different tests for different compound properties
organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.